|
|
 |
|||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||
 |
|||||||||||||||||
| JOURNAL HOME | HELP | CONTACT PUBLISHER | SUBSCRIBE | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
1 Department of Geology and Geophysics, University of Hawaii, 701 POST Building, 1680 East-West Road, Honolulu, Hawai‘i 96822. stevenst@hawaii.edu
Accepted 26 August 2007
| The first 20% of the full text of this article appears below. |
 |
... the snail, whose tender horns being hitShrinks backward in his shelly cave with pain,
And there, all smothered up, in shade doth sit,
Long after fearing to creep forth again. ...
— William Shakespeare, Venus and Adonis (1593)
For many decades, ecology textbooks presented classical competition theory without reservation. The central principle here is that two species sharing an essential resource that is in limited supply cannot coexist for long because the competitively superior species will eliminate the other one. The implication is that ecological communities should be characterized by division of resources among species, or niche partitioning. Thus, it is understandable that many paleontologists have continued to invoke concepts of competitive exclusion and niche partitioning in their studies of ancient guilds and communities. By now, however, there is a large body of neontological literature demonstrating that interspecific competition and resource partitioning play only a minor role in many ecological communities— especially benthic marine communities, which are the primary focus of the following discussion. Predation and physical disturbance inflict so much damage on biotas of the seafloor that populations of one species seldom monopolize a potentially limiting resource, except sporadically and locally. As a result, it is uncommon for any species to drive another to extinction through competitive exclusion—or even to force another species to drastically change its exploitation of any environmental resource throughout its geographic range. Furthermore, what particular species or group of species occupies a particular microhabitat is often simply a matter of time of arrival.
The present contribution follows a memoir (Stanley 2007) showing that the taxonomic diversification of the large groups of marine taxa that Sepkoski (1981) identified as the Paleozoic and Modern faunas has entailed intervals of unbridled exponential increase separated by episodic mass extinctions. On this largest biotic scale, it is evident
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  S. M. Stanley Evidence from ammonoids and conodonts for multiple Early Triassic mass extinctions PNAS, September 8, 2009; 106(36): 15264 - 15267. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. ZUSCHIN and M. STACHOWITSCH EPIFAUNA-DOMINATED BENTHIC SHELF ASSEMBLAGES: LESSONS FROM THE MODERN ADRIATIC SEA Palaios, April 1, 2009; 24(4): 211 - 221. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 A. Z. Krug, D. Jablonski, and J. W. Valentine Signature of the End-Cretaceous Mass Extinction in the Modern Biota Science, February 6, 2009; 323(5915): 767 - 771. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
B. Wilson Using SHEBI (SHE Analysis For Biozone Identification): To Proceed From The Top Down Or The Bottom Up? A Discussion Using Two Miocene Foraminiferal Successions From Trinidad, West Indies Palaios, September 1, 2008; 23(9): 636 - 644. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. W. Huntley, Y. Yanes, M. Kowalewski, C. Castillo, A. Delgado-Huertas, M. Ibanez, M. R. Alonso, J. E. Ortiz, and T. de Torres Testing limiting similarity in Quaternary terrestrial gastropods Paleobiology, September 1, 2008; 34(3): 378 - 388. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| JOURNAL HOME | HELP | CONTACT PUBLISHER | SUBSCRIBE | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
