Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
Paleobiology Email Content Delivery
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Paleobiology; November 2007; v. 33; no. 4; p. 639-640; DOI: 10.1666/0094-8373(2007)33[639:BTQATD]2.0.CO;2
© 2007 Paleontological Society
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hughes, N. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content

Between the quick and the dead

Nigel C. Hughes1

1 Department of Earth Sciences University of California Riverside, California 92521 nigel.hughes@ucr.edu

The first 20% of the full text of this article appears below.

Principles of Paleontology (third edition). Michael Foote and Arnold I. Miller. W. H. Freeman, San Francisco. 2007. 480 pages. Cloth $97.00.

In the first editions of Principles of Paleontology, Raup and Stanley produced a new kind of paleontology text, evidently a "leader" among texts, according to the classification Raup provides in the forward to the new edition. Foote and Miller's choice to revise that book, rather than attempt to replace it, fittingly reflects both the new edition's approach and content, and its homage to its predecessor. The challenge that Foote and Miller faced, as Raup articulated in the forward, was to provide a book that encapsulates current knowledge in a field that has matured considerably in both practice and theory, while continuing to prompt the way forward.

The new edition certainly addresses a need. The magnitude of work required to move beyond second edition of Principles in a comprehensive manner, yet remaining mindful of the limited curriculum space available for upper-level undergraduate classes in paleontology, may explain why no one had effectively usurped the older edition to date. But the absence of a successor left the field hanging. There has been no easily accessible summary of the developments that . . . [Full Text of this Article]







JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Paleontological Society