Quick Search:    advanced search

GSW Home   GeoRef Home   My GSW Alerts   Contact GSW   About GSW   Journals List   Help

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (2) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Finarelli, J. A. Search for Related Content GeoRef GeoRef Citation

Hierarchy and the reconstruction of evolutionary trends: evidence for constraints on the evolution of body size in terrestrial caniform carnivorans (Mammalia)

¹ John A. Finarelli. Department of Geological Sciences, University of Michigan, 2534 C. C. Little Building, 1100 North University Avenue, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109 and University of Michigan, Museum of Paleontology, 1529 Ruthven Museum, 1109 Geddes Road, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109. john.finarelli{at}umich.edu

Body mass is an important organism-level variable in mammalian biology, correlated with physiology, life history, and ecology. To analyze the dynamics of body size evolution, increases and decreases in body mass were tallied for ancestor-descendant (AD) species pairs for 519 terrestrial caniform taxa. To account for uncertainty phylogeny, a bootstrapping routine shuffled hypothesized AD pairs, and average proportions of increases were binned as a function of ancestral body mass. A set of models relating the rate of body size increase were evaluated with the Akaike Information Criterion (AIC). AIC selected three models of the candidate set as equivalent in support by the observed body mass data. These three models propose body size increase for small AD pairs and body size decrease for large AD pairs, although they differ in their treatment of taxa at intermediate sizes.

These results demonstrate the presence of constraints bounding the caniform distribution at large and small body sizes, stabilizing the distribution through time, which stands in contrast to a broader mammalian pattern. At a finer phylogenetic scale, subclades within intermediate size classes display proportions that are significantly different from unbiased, with several clades previously cited as examples of "Cope's Rule" showing biased increases in size, and basal mustelids (badgers, and allied genera), Mephitidae (skunks), and Vulpini ("foxes") exhibiting biased decreases. The caniform pattern is therefore the result of superimposed, clade-specific trajectories, demonstrating that the inferred dynamics of body size evolution and even the direction of trends in body size evolution within the Caniformia, and for mammals in general, depend on the hierarchical scale of the analysis.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. A. Finarelli Does encephalization correlate with life history or metabolic rate in Carnivora? Biol Lett, December 9, 2009; (2009) rsbl.2009.0787v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. A. Finarelli and J. J. Flynn Brain-size evolution and sociality in Carnivora PNAS, June 9, 2009; 106(23): 9345 - 9349. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]