Quick Search:    advanced search

GSW Home   GeoRef Home   My GSW Alerts   Contact GSW   About GSW   Journals List   Help

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Finnegan, S. Articles by Wang, S. C. Search for Related Content GeoRef GeoRef Citation

The Red Queen revisited: reevaluating the age selectivity of Phanerozoic marine genus extinctions

¹ Seth Finnegan and Jonathan L. Payne. Department of Geological and Environmental Sciences, Stanford University, 450 Serra Mall, Building 320, Stanford, California 94305. sethf{at}stanford.edu
² Steve C. Wang. Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Swarthmore College, 500 College Ave, Swarthmore, Pennsylvania 19081

Extinction risk is inversely related to genus age (time since first appearance) in most intervals of the Phanerozoic marine fossil record, in apparent contradiction to the macroevolutionary Red Queen's Hypothesis, which posits that extinction risk is independent of taxon age. Age-dependent increases in the mean species richness and geographic range of genera have been invoked to reconcile this genus-level observation with the presumed prevalence of Red Queen dynamics at the species level. Here we test these explanations with data from the Paleobiology Database. Multiple logistic regression demonstrates that the association of extinction risk with genus age is not adequately explained by species richness or geographic range: there is a residual association between age and extinction risk even when range and richness effects are accounted for. Throughout most of the Phanerozoic the age selectivity gradient is highest among the youngest age cohorts, whereas there is no association between age and extinction risk among older age cohorts. Some of the apparent age selectivity of extinction in the global fauna is attributable to differences in extinction rate among taxonomic groups, but extinction risk declines with genus age even within most taxonomic orders. Notable exceptions to this pattern include the Cambrian–Ordovician, latest Permian, Triassic, and Paleocene intervals. The association of age with extinction risk could reflect sampling heterogeneity or taxonomic practice more than biological reality, but at present it is difficult to evaluate or correct for such biases. Alternatively, the pattern may reflect consistent extinction selectivity on some as-yet unidentified covariate of genus age. Although this latter explanation is not compatible with a Red Queen model if most genus extinctions have resulted from biological interactions, it may be applicable if most genus extinctions have instead been caused by recurrent physical disturbances that repeatedly impose similar selective pressures.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				K. Roy, G. Hunt, D. Jablonski, A. Z Krug, and J. W Valentine A macroevolutionary perspective on species range limits Proc R Soc B, April 22, 2009; 276(1661): 1485 - 1493. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. J. Benton The Red Queen and the Court Jester: Species Diversity and the Role of Biotic and Abiotic Factors Through Time Science, February 6, 2009; 323(5915): 728 - 732. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]