Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
Paleobiology Don't get GSW? Talk to your librarian.
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Paleobiology; March 2008; v. 34; no. 2; p. 229-246; DOI: 10.1666/0094-8373(2008)034[0229:COWVCI]2.0.CO;2
© 2008 Paleontological Society
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jackson, F. D.
Right arrow Articles by Chiappe, L. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Comparison of water vapor conductance in a titanosaur egg from the Upper Cretaceous of Argentina and a Megaloolithus siruguei egg from Spain

Frankie D. Jackson1, David J. Varricchio1, Robert A. Jackson1, Bernat Vila2 and Luis M. Chiappe3

1 Frankie D. Jackson, David J. Varricchio, and Robert A. Jackson. Department of Earth Sciences, Montana State University, Bozeman, Montana 59717. frankiej{at}montana.edu
2 Bernat Vila. Institut Català de Paleontologia, Carrer Escola Industrial 23, 08201 Sabadell, Barcelona, Spain
3 Luis M. Chiappe. Department of Vertebrate Paleontology, Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County, Los Angeles, California 90007

We calculated water vapor conductance (a product of eggshell porosity) from the first definitively identified sauropod egg (Megaloolithus patagonicus) from the Auca Mahuevo locality in Argentina. We then compared the results with those from M. siruguei (an egg type long associated with sauropod dinosaurs) from the Pinyes locality in Spain. The 14-cm Auca Mahuevo egg has a thinner eggshell and 47 times fewer pores than the 22-cm M. siruguei specimen. The resulting water vapor conductance (Formula) of the titanosaur and M. siruguei eggs is 341 and 3979 mg H2O day–1 Torr–1, respectively; these values are two and ten times greater than in avian eggs of comparable size, but lower than in eggs of most modern reptiles. Clutches from Auca Mahuevo typically contain 20–40 eggs; in contrast, M. siruguei clutches from the Pinyes site average nine eggs. The Formula of M. siruguei exceeds that of the Argentine egg by an order of magnitude, supporting previous inferences of egg burial. The Formula of the Argentine titanosaur egg closely approximates that of Troodon and some oviraptorid eggs, previously calculated as equal to or two times greater than, respectively, the Formula of avian eggs of similar size. Higher embryonic growth rates (relative to modern reptiles), especially in some dinosaurs with large clutch mass, may have required incubation in a more open environment, where water conservation represented a more critical factor than in a buried clutch. The lower Formula calculated for the two megaloolithid eggs is consistent with previous interpretations of nesting mode that are based on site taphonomy and nesting traces. This study indicates that at least some dinosaurs did not fully bury their eggs.







JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2008 by Paleontological Society