Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
Paleobiology Signup for GSW Email News
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Paleobiology; December 2006; v. 32; no. 4; p. 578-601; DOI: 10.1666/05070.1
© 2006 Paleontological Society
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (5)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hunt, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Fitting and comparing models of phyletic evolution: random walks and beyond

Gene Hunt1

1 Gene Hunt. Department of Paleobiology, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C. 20013-7012. hunte{at}si.edu

For almost 30 years, paleontologists have analyzed evolutionary sequences in terms of simple null models, most commonly random walks. Despite this long history, there has been little discussion of how model parameters may be estimated from real paleontological data. In this paper, I outline a likelihood-based framework for fitting and comparing models of phyletic evolution. Because of its usefulness and historical importance, I focus on a general form of the random walk model. The long-term dynamics of this model depend on just two parameters: the mean (µstep) and variance ({sigma}2step) of the distribution of evolutionary transitions (or "steps"). The value of µstep determines the directionality of a sequence, and {sigma}2step governs its volatility. Simulations show that these two parameters can be inferred reliably from paleontological data regardless of how completely the evolving lineage is sampled.

In addition to random walk models, suitable modification of the likelihood function permits consideration of a wide range of alternative evolutionary models. Candidate evolutionary models may be compared on equal footing using information statistics such as the Akaike Information Criterion (AIC). Two extensions to this method are developed: modeling stasis as an evolutionary mode, and assessing the homogeneity of dynamics across multiple evolutionary sequences. Within this framework, I reanalyze two well-known published data sets: tooth measurements from the Eocene mammal Cantius, and shell shape in the planktonic foraminifera Contusotruncana. These analyses support previous interpretations about evolutionary mode in size and shape variables in Cantius, and confirm the significantly directional nature of shell shape evolution in Contusotruncana. In addition, this model-fitting approach leads to a further insight about the geographic structure of evolutionary change in this foraminiferan lineage.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
PaleobiologyHome page
C. Simpson and P. G. Harnik
Assessing the role of abundance in marine bivalve extinction over the post-Paleozoic
Paleobiology, December 1, 2009; 35(4): 631 - 647.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PaleobiologyHome page
D. Jones
Directional evolution in the conodont Pterospathodus
Paleobiology, September 1, 2009; 35(3): 413 - 431.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PaleobiologyHome page
T. H.G. Ezard and A. Purvis
paleoPhylo: free software to draw paleobiological phylogenies
Paleobiology, September 1, 2009; 35(3): 460 - 464.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PaleobiologyHome page
J. F. Pachut and R. L. Anstey
Inferring evolutionary modes in a fossil lineage (Bryozoa: Peronopora) from the Middle and Late Ordovician
Paleobiology, March 1, 2009; 35(2): 209 - 230.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PaleobiologyHome page
S. C. Wang and A. M. Bush
Adjusting global extinction rates to account for taxonomic susceptibility
Paleobiology, December 1, 2008; 34(4): 434 - 455.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ScienceHome page
M. Grey, J. W. Haggart, and P. L. Smith
Variation in Evolutionary Patterns Across the Geographic Range of a Fossil Bivalve
Science, November 21, 2008; 322(5905): 1238 - 1241.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PaleobiologyHome page
G. Hunt
Gradual or pulsed evolution: when should punctuational explanations be preferred?
Paleobiology, September 1, 2008; 34(3): 360 - 377.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
S. Alizon, M. Kucera, and V. A. A. Jansen
Competition between cryptic species explains variations in rates of lineage evolution
PNAS, August 26, 2008; 105(34): 12382 - 12386.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
P. M. Novack-Gottshall and M. A. Lanier
Scale-dependence of Cope's rule in body size evolution of Paleozoic brachiopods
PNAS, April 8, 2008; 105(14): 5430 - 5434.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PaleobiologyHome page
P. M. Novack-Gottshall
Ecosystem-wide body-size trends in Cambrian-Devonian marine invertebrate lineages
Paleobiology, March 1, 2008; 34(2): 210 - 228.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
G. Hunt
From the Cover: The relative importance of directional change, random walks, and stasis in the evolution of fossil lineages
PNAS, November 20, 2007; 104(47): 18404 - 18408.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Paleontological Society