Quick Search:    advanced search

GSW Home   GeoRef Home   My GSW Alerts   Contact GSW   About GSW   Journals List   Help

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (8) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Smith, J. T. Articles by Roy, K. Search for Related Content GeoRef GeoRef Citation

Selectivity during background extinction: Plio-Pleistocene scallops in California

¹ J. Travis Smith. Scripps Institution of Oceanography, University of California, San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla, California 92093-0244. j8smith{at}ucsd.edu
² Kaustuv Roy. Section of Ecology, Behavior, and Evolution, Division of Biological Sciences, University of California, San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla, California 92093-0116

Most studies of extinction selectivity have focused on mass extinctions. Here we analyze the patterns of susceptibility to extinction during the late Pliocene and Pleistocene of California in the family Pectinidae. The Pectinidae declined in diversity from a high of 32 species in the late Pliocene to the current level of 11 species living in the California region, indicating that the composition of the living fauna has been shaped primarily by extinction in the last several million years. Extinction appears to have occurred in one large pulse, but because of uneven sampling we were unable to resolve the timing further and have analyzed the patterns of extinction treating the late Pliocene through middle Pleistocene as a single period of elevated extinction. Extinctions were not random with regard to taxonomic relationships. Species-level extinctions were higher in more speciose genera, but these genera were buffered against genus-level extinctions. This resulted in a disproportionately large number of monospecific genera in the living fauna. In addition, extinctions were not random with regard to body size, with large species preferentially surviving. This selectivity pattern is evident only when clade membership is taken into account; when analyzed across the entire family, no pattern of size selectivity was apparent. Our results suggest that (1) patterns of extinction selectivity at the genus level may be a poor proxy for species-level patterns, and (2) whole-fauna analyses may not uncover strong selectivity within lineages.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. T. Smith and J. B. C. Jackson Ecology of extreme faunal turnover of tropical American scallops Paleobiology, January 1, 2009; 35(1): 77 - 93. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Foote, J. S. Crampton, A. G. Beu, and R. A. Cooper On the bidirectional relationship between geographic range and taxonomic duration Paleobiology, December 1, 2008; 34(4): 421 - 433. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. Jablonski Colloquium Paper: Extinction and the spatial dynamics of biodiversity PNAS, August 12, 2008; 105(Supplement_1): 11528 - 11535. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. M. Novack-Gottshall Using Simple Body-Size Metrics to Estimate Fossil Body Volume: Empirical Validation Using Diverse Paleozoic Invertebrates Palaios, March 1, 2008; 23(3): 163 - 173. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. R. Leighton and C. L. Schneider Taxon characteristics that promote survivorship through the Permian-Triassic interval: transition from the Paleozoic to the Mesozoic brachiopod fauna Paleobiology, January 1, 2008; 34(1): 65 - 79. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. M. Rivadeneira and P. A. Marquet Selective extinction of late Neogene bivalves on the temperate Pacific coast of South America Paleobiology, June 1, 2007; 33(3): 455 - 468. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]