Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
Paleobiology Email Content Delivery
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Paleobiology; September 2005; v. 31; no. 3; p. 480-502; DOI: 10.1666/0094-8373(2005)031[0480:RAAAOT]2.0.CO;2
© 2005 Paleontological Society
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (7)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Finnegan, S.
Right arrow Articles by Droser, M. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Relative and absolute abundance of trilobites and rhynchonelliform brachiopods across the Lower/Middle Ordovician boundary, eastern Basin and Range

Seth Finnegan1 and Mary L. Droser1

1 S. Finnegan and M. L. Droser. Department of Earth Sciences, University of California, Riverside, California 92521. finnes01{at}student.ucr.edu

Relative abundance data are of primary importance in paleoecology, but it is not always obvious how they should be interpreted. Because relative abundance is expressed as a proportion of the total sample, change in the abundance of one group necessarily changes the relative abundance of all groups in the sample. There are two possible interpretations for a trend in the relative abundance of a taxon: an "active" scenario in which the trend reflects change in the population density of the group itself, or a "passive" scenario in which the change is driven by population changes in other taxa. To discriminate between these scenarios it is necessary to collect absolute abundance data (abundance expressed as a function of sample area or volume).

We examine both absolute and relative abundance trends through a major paleoecological transition: the shift from trilobite-dominated to brachiopod-dominated paleocommunities in shallow marine carbonates spanning the Lower/Middle Ordovician boundary in western Utah and eastern Nevada. We sampled 61 carbonate mudstone and wackestone beds from the upper Ibex Series (Lower Ordovician) and lower Whiterock Series (Middle Ordovician) at three sections that span the boundary. All samples come from the shallow subtidal Bathyurid trilobite biofacies. Samples were broken into small pieces, and all skeletal fragments >2 mm were identified to the finest possible taxonomic level. Consistent with previous work on this interval, the relative abundance of trilobites declines sharply across the boundary, while the relative abundance of brachiopods increases. Absolute abundance data indicate that the decline in trilobite abundance is genuine and not an artifact of normalization. The trend is not easily explained by sampling bias, facies distribution, taphonomic regime, or sedimentation style.

The dramatic shift in abundance contrasts with relatively minor changes in relative genus richness across the boundary. This is partly ascribable to differences in the relative abundance structure of trilobite faunas. Though comparable numbers of trilobite and brachiopod genera occur above and below the boundary, the trilobite fauna from the upper Ibex Series has lower evenness then the lower Whiterock Series fauna. Hence sampled trilobite richness is high in the lower Whiterock despite the small number of specimens. This highlights the importance of collecting abundance data. Although these data suggest that in at least some cases richness and abundance patterns are not closely coupled, more robust richness data are necessary to confirm this conclusion.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
PaleobiologyHome page
A. Tomasovych and S. M. Kidwell
Fidelity of variation in species composition and diversity partitioning by death assemblages: time-averaging transfers diversity from beta to alpha levels
Paleobiology, January 1, 2009; 35(1): 94 - 118.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PALAIOSHome page
A. Tomasovych and J. Schlogl
Analyzing Variations in Cephalopod Abundances in Shell Concentrations: The Combined Effects of Production and Density-Dependent Cementation Rates
Palaios, October 1, 2008; 23(10): 648 - 666.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PaleobiologyHome page
S. Finnegan and M. L. Droser
Body size, energetics, and the Ordovician restructuring of marine ecosystems
Paleobiology, September 1, 2008; 34(3): 342 - 359.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PALAIOSHome page
J. J. Zambito IV, C. E. Mitchell, and H. D. Sheets
A Comparison of Sampling and Statistical Techniques for Analyzing Bulk-sampled Biofacies Composition
Palaios, May 1, 2008; 23(5): 313 - 321.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PALAIOSHome page
S. Finnegan and M. L. Droser
Reworking Diversity: Effects Of Storm Deposition On Evenness And Sampled Richness, Ordovician Of The Basin And Range, Utah And Nevada, Usa
Palaios, February 1, 2008; 23(2): 87 - 96.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PALAIOSHome page
A. M. BUSH, M. KOWALEWSKI, A. P. HOFFMEISTER, R. K. BAMBACH, and G. M. DALEY
POTENTIAL PALEOECOLOGIC BIASES FROM SIZE-FILTERING OF FOSSILS: STRATEGIES FOR SIEVING
Palaios, December 1, 2007; 22(6): 612 - 622.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PaleobiologyHome page
A. M. Bush, R. K. Bambach, and G. M. Daley
Changes in theoretical ecospace utilization in marine fossil assemblages between the mid-Paleozoic and late Cenozoic
Paleobiology, January 1, 2007; 33(1): 76 - 97.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PALAIOSHome page
S. E. PETERS
GENUS RICHNESS IN CAMBRIAN-ORDOVICIAN BENTHIC MARINE COMMUNITIES IN NORTH AMERICA
Palaios, December 1, 2006; 21(6): 580 - 587.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PaleobiologyHome page
J. S. Crampton, M. Foote, A. G. Beu, P. A. Maxwell, R. A. Cooper, I. Matcham, B. A. Marshall, and C. M. Jones
The ark was full! Constant to declining Cenozoic shallow marine biodiversity on an isolated midlatitude continent
Paleobiology, December 1, 2006; 32(4): 509 - 532.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PaleobiologyHome page
M. Kowalewski, W. Kiessling, M. Aberhan, F. T. Fursich, D. Scarponi, S. L. B. Wood, and A. P. Hoffmeister
Ecological, taxonomic, and taphonomic components of the post-Paleozoic increase in sample-level species diversity of marine benthos
Paleobiology, December 1, 2006; 32(4): 533 - 561.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Paleontological Society