|
|
 |
|||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||
 |
|||||||||||||||||
| JOURNAL HOME | HELP | CONTACT PUBLISHER | SUBSCRIBE | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
1 Michael J. Donoghue. Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology and Peabody Museum of Natural History, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut 06520. michael.donoghue{at}yale.edu
Improvements in our understanding of green plant phylogeny are casting new light on the connection between character evolution and diversification. The repeated discovery of paraphyly has helped disentangle what once appeared to be phylogenetically coincident character changes, but this has also highlighted the existence of sequences of character change, no one element of which can cleanly be identified as the "key innovation" responsible for shifting diversification rate. In effect, the cause becomes distributed across a nested series of nodes in the tree. Many of the most conspicuous plant "innovations" (such as macrophyllous leaves) are underlain by earlier, more subtle shifts in development (such as overtopping growth), which appear to have enabled the exploration of a greater range of morphological designs. Often it appears that these underlying changes have been brought about at the level of cell interactions within meristems, highlighting the need for developmental models and experiments focused at this level. The standard practice of attempting to identify correlations between recurrent character change (such as the tree growth habit) and clade diversity is complicated by the observation that the "same" trait may be constructed quite differently in different lineages (e.g., different forms of cambial activity), with some solutions imposing more architectural limitations than others. These thoughts highlight the need for a more nuanced view, which has implications for comparative methods. They also bear on issues central to Stephen Jay Gould's vision of macroevolution, including exaptation and evolutionary recurrence in relation to constraint and the repeatability of evolution.
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  B. R. Moore and M. J. Donoghue A Bayesian approach for evaluating the impact of historical events on rates of diversification PNAS, March 17, 2009; 106(11): 4307 - 4312. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 R. M. Ogburn and E. J. Edwards Anatomical variation in Cactaceae and relatives: Trait lability and evolutionary innovation Am. J. Botany, February 1, 2009; 96(2): 391 - 408. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. H. Williams Novelties of the flowering plant pollen tube underlie diversification of a key life history stage PNAS, August 12, 2008; 105(32): 11259 - 11263. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. H. Erwin Colloquium Paper: Extinction as the loss of evolutionary history PNAS, August 12, 2008; 105(Supplement_1): 11520 - 11527. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. Baguna, P. Martinez, J. Paps, and M. Riutort Back in time: a new systematic proposal for the Bilateria Phil Trans R Soc B, April 27, 2008; 363(1496): 1481 - 1491. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 E. A. Sperling, D. Pisani, and K. J. Peterson Poriferan paraphyly and its implications for Precambrian palaeobiology Geological Society, London, Special Publications, January 1, 2007; 286(1): 355 - 368. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
E. J. Edwards, R. Nyffeler, and M. J. Donoghue Basal cactus phylogeny: implications of Pereskia (Cactaceae) paraphyly for the transition to the cactus life form Am. J. Botany, July 1, 2005; 92(7): 1177 - 1188. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| JOURNAL HOME | HELP | CONTACT PUBLISHER | SUBSCRIBE | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
