|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
| JOURNAL HOME | HELP | CONTACT PUBLISHER | SUBSCRIBE | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
1 Martin A. Buzas. Department of Paleobiology, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C. 20560-0121. buzas.marty{at}nmnh.si.edu
2 Lee-Ann C. Hayek. Mathematics and Statistics, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C. 20560-0121. hayek.lee-ann{at}nmnh.si.edu
Although there is extraordinary interest in the quantitative measurement of species diversity, published statements on the behavior of the components of species diversity are contradictory and lead to opposite conclusions. In this paper, we demonstrate that the confusion is due to two key oversights: (1) whether or not biological sampling is carried out within or between communities; and (2) determination of the statistical distribution underlying a biological community, which is crucial for the evaluation of all of the components of diversity measurement.
The problem of sampling "within" a population or community is basically distinct from the equivalent integration of structure and diversity measurement "between" differing multispecies populations. "Within-community sampling" is defined as a set of biological samples from a statistical population that has a particular statistical distribution or a constant value for the associated parameter(s). As the number of individuals increases along with the number of species, for a log series distribution, the diversity measures of Shannon's H, log series or Fisher's
, and Simpson's Index 1/
remain constant while the evenness measures of Buzas-Gibson's E and Pielou's J decrease. For a log-normal distribution, J will remain constant while E decreases and
, 1/
, and H increase. No single measure of evenness remains constant over all statistical distributions, so if constancy as a type of independence is required, the appropriate distribution must first be determined. Each species ensemble is mathematically fixed by the applicable statistical distribution.
In contrast, "between-community sampling" is defined as a set of biological samples from different statistical distributions and/or the same distribution with differing parametric values. If sampling is between communities and S increases while the number of individuals remains constant, then all the other measures considered here increase. The exception is the broken stick, for which E remains constant while H, J,
, and 1/
increase.
Herein we propose and justify the use of the log-series distribution (with regression on the information decomposition equation) as a null model for determination of community structure and demonstrate that the community structure of a Miocene bed at Calvert Cliffs, Maryland, is a log series by use of this new unified methodology.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
K. M. LAYOU ECOLOGICAL RESTRUCTURING AFTER EXTINCTION: THE LATE ORDOVICIAN (MOHAWKIAN) OF THE EASTERN UNITED STATES Palaios, February 1, 2009; 24(2): 118 - 130. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Wilson, K. Miller, A.-L. Thomas, N. Cooke, and R. Ramsingh FORAMINIFERA IN THE MANGAL AT THE CARONI SWAMP, TRINIDAD: DIVERSITY, POPULATION STRUCTURE AND RELATION TO SEA LEVEL Journal of Foraminiferal Research, April 1, 2008; 38(2): 127 - 136. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Finnegan and M. L. Droser Reworking Diversity: Effects Of Storm Deposition On Evenness And Sampled Richness, Ordovician Of The Basin And Range, Utah And Nevada, Usa Palaios, February 1, 2008; 23(2): 87 - 96. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Lu, T. Shen, M. R. Bennett, P. G. Wolynes, and J. Hasty Phenotypic variability of growing cellular populations PNAS, November 27, 2007; 104(48): 18982 - 18987. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L.-A. C. Hayek, M. A. Buzas, and L. E. Osterman COMMUNITY STRUCTURE OF FORAMINIFERAL COMMUNITIES WITHIN TEMPORAL BIOZONES FROM THE WESTERN ARCTIC OCEAN Journal of Foraminiferal Research, January 1, 2007; 37(1): 33 - 40. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. D. Olszewski and S. M. Kidwell The preservational fidelity of evenness in molluscan death assemblages Paleobiology, January 1, 2007; 33(1): 1 - 23. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. E. PETERS GENUS RICHNESS IN CAMBRIAN-ORDOVICIAN BENTHIC MARINE COMMUNITIES IN NORTH AMERICA Palaios, December 1, 2006; 21(6): 580 - 587. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. J. Wagner, M. A. Kosnik, and S. Lidgard Abundance distributions imply elevated complexity of post-Paleozoic marine ecosystems. Science, November 24, 2006; 314(5803): 1289 - 1292. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| JOURNAL HOME | HELP | CONTACT PUBLISHER | SUBSCRIBE | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |