Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
Paleobiology Email Content Delivery
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Paleobiology; January 2005; v. 31; no. 1; p. 151-164; DOI: 10.1666/0094-8373(2005)031<0151:ARIMCE>2.0.CO;2
© 2005 Paleontological Society
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (5)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gahn, F. J.
Right arrow Articles by Baumiller, T. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Arm regeneration in Mississippian crinoids: evidence of intense predation pressure in the Paleozoic?

Forest J. Gahn1 and Tomasz K. Baumiller2

1 Forest J. Gahn. Department of Paleobiology, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C. 20013-7012. gahn.forest{at}nmnh.si.edu
2 Tomasz K. Baumiller. Museum of Paleontology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109-1079. tomaszb{at}umich.edu

Although direct predator-prey interactions are unobservable in the fossil record, predation has been used to explain many evolutionary trends. Evidence of predation supporting such hypotheses is often presented as isolated instances of preserved sublethal damage, and less commonly, as the frequency of such injuries. For instance, numerous morphological and ecological trends and innovations observed in Phanerozoic crinoids have been causally linked to predation, and whereas the high frequency of arm regeneration in living crinoids is generally assumed to represent intense predation, attempts to assess regeneration frequency and patterns in paleontological samples are few. Can the frequency of fossil injuries be assessed to test hypothesized predation-driven trends, or are such data unavailable?

To address this question, we analyzed regeneration in crinoids from the lower Mississippian (Kinderhookian) Maynes Creek Formation near Le Grand, Iowa, a locality renowned for the preservation of thousands of crinoids in tangled masses of crowns, stalks, and holdfasts. Nine percent of the specimens that we examined contained at least one regenerating arm; however, whereas some species lacked evidence of regeneration, others preserved up to 27% arm regeneration. Furthermore, we observed specimens with all arms regenerating, multiple adjacent arms regenerating from the same place along the arm, and a specimen with a damaged and regenerated primaxil and anal sac.

The highest regeneration frequency was observed in the most abundant species, Rhodocrinites kirbyi, a significantly higher value than expected under a model of no taxonomic selectivity (binomial: p < 0.05). Furthermore, bootstrapped simulations of the probable number of regenerated individuals suggest that the number of regenerated arms observed in our sample is two to three times less than what existed in the living population. Rhodocrinites kirbyi constituted over 40% of the individuals in the Le Grand crinoid fauna and had the longest stalk of the studied species. In addition, regeneration in R. kirbyi is size related, with individuals above median dorsal cup height (7 mm) displaying nearly 50% regeneration, and smaller individuals only 2% (a statistically significant difference; {chi}2 test: p < 0.001). The regeneration patterns in R. kirbyi are consistent with predatory attacks that target the most apparent prey. Moreover, this study suggests that predation is the most likely explanation for the regeneration patterns observed in Le Grand crinoids, and that the fossil record potentially provides a valuable, yet overlooked, data source for testing hypotheses pertinent to the role of predation in the evolution of Phanerozoic marine life.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
PALAIOSHome page
P. GORZELAK and M. A. SALAMON
SIGNS OF BENTHIC PREDATION ON LATE JURASSIC STALKED CRINOIDS, PRELIMINARY DATA
Palaios, January 1, 2009; 24(1): 70 - 73.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of PaleontologyHome page
J. Bohaty
Pre- and Postmortem Skeletal Modifications of the Cupressocrinitidae (Crinoidea, Cladida)
Journal of Paleontology, January 1, 2009; 83(1): 45 - 62.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PaleobiologyHome page
M. Grey, E. G. Boulding, and M. E. Brookfield
Estimating multivariate selection gradients in the fossil record: a naticid gastropod case study
Paleobiology, January 1, 2006; 32(1): 100 - 108.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Paleontological Society