|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
| JOURNAL HOME | HELP | CONTACT PUBLISHER | SUBSCRIBE | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
1 Peter Wilf. Department of Geosciences, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802 and Museum of Paleontology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109. pwilf{at}psu.edu
2 Kirk R. Johnson. Department of Earth Sciences, Denver Museum of Nature & Science, Denver, Colorado 80205. KJohnson{at}dmns.org
We present a quantitative analysis of megafloral turnover across the Cretaceous/Paleogene boundary (K/T) based on the most complete record, which comes from the Williston Basin in southwestern North Dakota. More than 22,000 specimens of 353 species have been recovered from 161 localities in a stratigraphic section that is continuous across and temporally calibrated to the K/T and two paleomagnetic reversals. Floral composition changes dynamically during the Cretaceous, shifts sharply at the K/T, and is virtually static during the Paleocene. The K/T is associated with the loss of nearly all dominant species, a significant drop in species richness, and no subsequent recovery. Only 29 of 130 Cretaceous species that appear in more than one stratigraphic level (non-singletons) cross the K/T. Only 11 non-singletons appear first during the Paleocene. The survivors, most of which were minor elements of Cretaceous floras, dominate the impoverished Paleocene floras. Confidence intervals show that the range terminations of most Cretaceous plant taxa are well sampled. We infer that nearly all species with last appearances more than about 5 m below (approximately 70 Kyr before) the K/T truly disappeared before the boundary because of normal turnover dynamics and climate changes; these species should not be counted as K/T victims. Maxima of last appearances occur from 5 to 3 m below the K/T. Interpretation of these last appearances at a fine stratigraphic scale is problematic because of local facies changes, and megafloral data alone, even with confidence intervals, are not sufficient for precise location of an extinction horizon. For this purpose, we rely on high-resolution palynological data previously recovered from continuous facies in the same sections; these place a major plant extinction event precisely at the K/T impact horizon. Accordingly, we interpret the significant cluster of last appearances less than 5 m below the K/T as the signal of a real extinction at the K/T that is recorded slightly down section. A maximum estimate of plant extinction, based on species lost that were present in the uppermost 5 m of Cretaceous strata, is 57%. Palynological data, with higher stratigraphic but lower taxonomic resolution than the megafloral results, provide a minimum estimate of a 30% extinction. The 57% estimate is significantly lower than previous megafloral observations, but these were based on a larger thickness of latest Cretaceous strata, including most of a globally warm interval, and were less sensitive to turnover before the K/T. The loss of one-third to three-fifths of plant species supports a scenario of sudden ecosystem collapse, presumably caused by the Chicxulub impact.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
T. Wappler, E. D. Currano, P. Wilf, J. Rust, and C. C. Labandeira No post-Cretaceous ecosystem depression in European forests? Rich insect-feeding damage on diverse middle Palaeocene plants, Menat, France Proc R Soc B, December 22, 2009; 276(1677): 4271 - 4277. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. C. Wang, D. J. Chudzicki, and P. J. Everson Optimal estimators of the position of a mass extinction when recovery potential is uniform Paleobiology, September 1, 2009; 35(3): 447 - 459. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. A. Fawcett, S. Maere, and Y. Van de Peer From the Cover: Plants with double genomes might have had a better chance to survive the Cretaceous-Tertiary extinction event PNAS, April 7, 2009; 106(14): 5737 - 5742. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. McLoughlin, R. J. Carpenter, G. J. Jordan, and R. S. Hill Seed ferns survived the end-Cretaceous mass extinction in Tasmania Am. J. Botany, April 1, 2008; 95(4): 465 - 471. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. C. McElwain, M. E. Popa, S. P. Hesselbo, M. Haworth, and F. Surlyk Macroecological responses of terrestrial vegetation to climatic and atmospheric change across the Triassic/Jurassic boundary in East Greenland Paleobiology, December 1, 2007; 33(4): 547 - 573. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Z. Krug and M. E. Patzkowsky Geographic variation in turnover and recovery from the Late Ordovician mass extinction Paleobiology, June 1, 2007; 33(3): 435 - 454. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. C. Wang and P. J. Everson Confidence intervals for pulsed mass extinction events Paleobiology, March 1, 2007; 33(2): 324 - 336. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. D. Roopnarine Extinction cascades and catastrophe in ancient food webs Paleobiology, January 1, 2006; 32(1): 1 - 19. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. A. Green and L. J. Hickey Leaf architectural profiles of angiosperm floras across the Cretaceous/Tertiary boundary Am J Sci, December 1, 2005; 305(10): 983 - 1013. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| JOURNAL HOME | HELP | CONTACT PUBLISHER | SUBSCRIBE | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |