Quick Search:    advanced search

GSW Home   GeoRef Home   My GSW Alerts   Contact GSW   About GSW   Journals List   Help

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (16) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Gregory, T. R. Search for Related Content GeoRef GeoRef Citation

Macroevolution, hierarchy theory, and the C-value enigma

¹ Division of Invertebrate Zoology, American Museum of Natural History, Central Park West at Seventy-ninth Street, New York, New York 10024. rgregory{at}genomesize.com

For more than 60 years, evolutionary biologists have debated the issue of whether the processes of genetic change observable within populations (microevolution) can provide an adequate explanation for the large-scale patterns in the history of life (macroevolution). In general, population geneticists have argued in favor of microevolutionary extrapolation, whereas paleontologists have sought to establish an autonomous and hierarchical macroevolutionary theory based on the operation of selection at several levels of biological organization (especially species). The massive variation in eukaryotic genome sizes (haploid nuclear DNA contents, or "C-values") has similarly been a subject of debate for more than half a century, and it has become clear that no one-dimensional explanation can account for it. In this article, the basic concepts of macroevolutionary theory are reviewed and then applied to the long-standing puzzle of genome size variation (the "C-value enigma"). Genome size evolution provides a clear example of hierarchy in action and therefore lends support to the theoretical approach of macroevolutionists. Perhaps more importantly, it is apparent that genome evolution cannot be understood without such a hierarchical approach, thereby providing an intriguing conceptual link between the most reductionistic and expansive subjects of evolutionary study.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. S. Hawkins, H. Kim, J. D. Nason, R. A. Wing, and J. F. Wendel Differential lineage-specific amplification of transposable elements is responsible for genome size variation in Gossypium Genome Res., October 1, 2006; 16(10): 1252 - 1261. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]