Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
Paleobiology Email Content Delivery
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Paleobiology; January 2004; v. 30; no. 1; p. 108-128; DOI: 10.1666/0094-8373(2004)030<0108:EOHTEO>2.0.CO;2
© 2004 Paleontological Society
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Holliday, J. A.
Right arrow Articles by Steppan, S. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Evolution of hypercarnivory: the effect of specialization on morphological and taxonomic diversity

Jill A. Holliday1 and Scott J. Steppan1

1 Department of Biological Science, Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida 32306-1100. holliday{at}bio.fsu.edu, steppan{at}bio.fsu.edu

The effects of specialization on subsequent morphological evolution are poorly understood. Specialization has been implicated in both adaptive radiations that result from key innovations and evolutionary "dead ends," where specialized characteristics appear to limit subsequent evolutionary options. Despite much theoretical debate, however, empirical studies remain infrequent. In this paper, we use sister-group comparisons to evaluate the effect of morphological specialization to a particular ecological niche, hypercarnivory, on subsequent taxonomic and morphological diversity. Six sets of sister groups are identified in which one clade exhibits hypercarnivorous characteristics and the sister clade does not. Comparison results are summed across the categories "hypercarnivore" and "sister group." We also evaluate whether increasing degrees of specialization are correlated with decreasing phenotypic variation. Results presented here indicate that specialization to hypercarnivory has no effect on taxonomic diversity, but a strong effect on subsequent morphological diversity related to the jaws and dentition, and that increasing specialization does not correlate with morphological diversity except in the most specialized saber-toothed taxa, which exhibit higher variance than less specialized morphs, possibly due to selection on other characteristics.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
PaleobiologyHome page
G. J. Slater and B. Van Valkenburgh
Long in the tooth: evolution of sabertooth cat cranial shape
Paleobiology, June 1, 2008; 34(3): 403 - 419.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Integr. Comp. Biol.Home page
B. Van Valkenburgh
Deja vu: the evolution of feeding morphologies in the Carnivora
Integr. Comp. Biol., July 1, 2007; 47(1): 147 - 163.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2008 by Paleontological Society