Quick
Search: 		  
advanced search
 GSW Home   GeoRef Home   My GSW Alerts   Contact GSW   About GSW   Journals List   Help 
Paleobiology Don't get GSW? Talk to your librarian.
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Paleobiology; December 2002; v. 28; no. 4; p. 508-526; DOI: 10.1666/0094-8373(2002)028<0508:VACOSA>2.0.CO;2
© 2002 Paleontological Society
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (20)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dayan, T.
Right arrow Articles by Simberloff, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Variation and covariation of skulls and teeth: modern carnivores and the interpretation of fossil mammals

Tamar Dayan1,3, David Wool1 and Daniel Simberloff2,3

1 Tamar Dayan and David Wool. Department of Zoology, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 69978, Israel dayant{at}post.tau.ac.il
2 Daniel Simberloff. Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee 37996-1610
3 Corresponding authors

Teeth are generally the best-preserved elements among mammal fossil remains and are highly diagnostic characters. Consequently, much mammalian paleontological, systematic, and evolutionary research focuses on teeth, so it is important to understand how they vary and covary with other characters. Dental traits within populations of carnivores appear to be more variable than cranial traits, a pattern that results only partly from their usually smaller size. Furthermore, dental traits, although highly correlated with one another, are not highly correlated with cranial traits, which are also highly correlated with one another. Thus, teeth and cranial bones may be subject to quite different selective pressures and genetic/developmental constraints and may suggest different microevolutionary scenarios. Vestigial teeth show significantly greater variability than expected, reflecting the absence of stabilizing selection.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Proc R Soc BHome page
S. Meiri, T. Dayan, D. Simberloff, and R. Grenyer
Life on the edge: carnivore body size variation is all over the place
Proc R Soc B, April 22, 2009; 276(1661): 1469 - 1476.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Paleontological Society