Quick Search:    advanced search

GSW Home   GeoRef Home   My GSW Alerts   Contact GSW   About GSW   Journals List   Help

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (20) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Leighton, L. R. Search for Related Content GeoRef GeoRef Citation

Inferring predation intensity in the marine fossil record

¹ Lindsey R. Leighton. Department of Geological Sciences, San Diego State University, San Diego, California 92182. leighton{at}geology.sdsu.edu

Accurate estimates of predation intensity, the frequency of mortality from predation, are critical to studies of the evolution of species in response to predation, and to studies of predator-prey systems in general. Most commonly used indirect proxies for predation intensity in the fossil record have logistical or theoretical problems. Direct proxies, using actual traces of predatory activity, such as drilling and repair scars, may hold more promise. However, these direct proxies often have been used in conjunction with optimal foraging models, and in this context, the underlying assumptions and predictions of optimal foraging are examined.

Results from theoretical models using optimal foraging suggest that (1) the ratio of internal shell volume to shell thickness of prey (benefit/cost ratio) may be a questionable measurement of prey "value" to the predator, as it fails to account adequately for energetic cost to the predator during pursuit and grappling; (2) drilling and repair frequency are invalid measures of prey preference, because optimal foraging predicts that specific prey types are either always taken or always ignored; (3) pooled drilling frequency will not be a useful metric of predation intensity in systems in which the predator need not always drill; and (4) an increase in repair frequency can be a consequence of either an increase or a decrease in predation intensity.

Although drilling frequency may not indicate prey preference, it is a valid proxy for selection due to predation. An approach using size classes, in which the minimum size at which a predation refuge is achieved, is suggested for use with repair frequency.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				Y. YANES and C. L. TYLER DRILLING PREDATION INTENSITY AND FEEDING PREFERENCES BY NUCELLA (MURICIDAE) ON LIMPETS INFERRED FROM A DEAD-SHELL ASSEMBLAGE Palaios, May 1, 2009; 24(5): 280 - 289. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. D. Schiffbauer, Y. Yanes, C. L. Tyler, M. Kowalewski, and L. R. Leighton The Microstructural Record of Predation: A New Approach for Identifying Predatory Drill Holes Palaios, December 1, 2008; 23(12): 810 - 820. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Grey, E. G. Boulding, and M. E. Brookfield Estimating multivariate selection gradients in the fossil record: a naticid gastropod case study Paleobiology, January 1, 2006; 32(1): 100 - 108. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Aronowsky and L.R. Leighton Mystery of naticid predation history solved: Evidence from a "living fossil" species: Comment and Reply Geology, June 1, 2003; 31(6): e34 - e35. [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Aronowsky and L.R. Leighton Mystery of naticid predation history solved: Evidence from a "living fossil" species: Comment and Reply: COMMENT Geology, January 1, 2003; 31(1): e34 - e35. [Full Text] [PDF]