Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
Paleobiology Don't get GSW? Talk to your librarian.
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Paleobiology; September 2001; v. 27; no. 3; p. 512-530; DOI: 10.1666/0094-8373(2001)027<0512:TDOTPI>2.0.CO;2
© 2001 Paleontological Society
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (19)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Palmqvist, P.
Right arrow Articles by Arribas, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Taphonomic decoding of the paleobiological information locked in a lower Pleistocene assemblage of large mammals

Paul Palmqvist1 and Alfonso Arribas2

1 Paul Palmqvist. Departamento de Geología y Ecología (Área de Paleontología), Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de Málaga. 29071 Málaga, Spain. Paul.Palmqvist{at}uma.es
2 Alfonso Arribas. Museo Geominero, Instituto Geológico y Minero (I.G.M.E.), c/ Ríos Rosas, 23. 28003 Madrid, Spain. A.Arribas{at}igme.es

The processes of fossilization have usually been perceived by paleontologists as destructive ones, leading to consecutive (and in most cases irretrievable) losses of paleobiological information. However, recent developments of conceptual issues and methodological approaches have revealed that the decrease in paleobiological information runs parallel to the gain of taphonomic information. This taphonomic imprinting often makes it possible to decode the fraction of paleobiological information that was lost during fossilization, and may also contribute new data for deciphering paleobiological information that was not originally preserved in the assemblage, such as paleoethology. A good example is the study of the macrovertebrate assemblage from the lower Pleistocene site at Venta Micena (Orce, southeastern Spain). Taphonomic analysis showed that the giant, short-faced hyenas (Pachycrocuta brevirostris) selectively transported ungulate carcasses and body parts to their maternity dens as a function of the mass of the ungulates scavenged. The fracturing of major limb bones in the dens was also highly selective, correlating with marrow content and mineral density. Important differences in bone-cracking intensity were related to which species the bones came from, which in turn biased the composition of the bone assemblage. The analysis of mortality patterns deduced for ungulate species from juvenile/adult proportions revealed that most skeletal remains were scavenged by the hyenas from carcasses of animals hunted by hypercarnivores, such as saber-tooths and wild dogs. Analytical study of the Venta Micena assemblage has unlocked paleobiological information that was lost during its taphonomic history, and has even provided paleobiological information that was not preserved in the original bone assemblage, such as the paleoethology of P. brevirostris, which differed substantially from modern hyenas in being a strict scavenger of the prey hunted by other carnivores.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
PaleobiologyHome page
S. W. Lansing, S. M. Cooper, E. E. Boydston, and K. E. Holekamp
Taphonomic and zooarchaeological implications of spotted hyena (Crocuta crocuta) bone accumulations in Kenya: a modern behavioral ecological approach
Paleobiology, March 1, 2009; 35(2): 289 - 309.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PALAIOSHome page
P. Palmqvist, J. A. Perez-Claros, C. M. Janis, B. Figueirido, V. Torregrosa, and D. R. Grocke
Biogeochemical and Ecomorphological Inferences On Prey Selection and Resource Partitioning Among Mammalian Carnivores In An Early Pleistocene Community
Palaios, November 1, 2008; 23(11): 724 - 737.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PaleobiologyHome page
C. M. Faux and K. Padian
The opisthotonic posture of vertebrate skeletons: postmortem contraction or death throes?
Paleobiology, March 1, 2007; 33(2): 201 - 226.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PALAIOSHome page
P. P. A. MAZZA
POGGIO ROSSO (UPPER VALDARNO, CENTRAL ITALY), A WINDOW ON LATEST PLIOCENE WILDLIFE
Palaios, October 1, 2006; 21(5): 493 - 498.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PaleobiologyHome page
Paleoecological reconstruction of a lower Pleistocene large mammal community using biogeochemical ({delta}13C, {delta}15N, {delta}18O, Sr:Zn) and ecomorphological approaches
Paleobiology, June 1, 2003; 29(2): 205 - 229.



Home page
Journal of PaleontologyHome page
ON THE PRESENCE OF MEGANTEREON WHITEI AT THE SOUTH TURKWEL HOMINID SITE, NORTHERN KENYA
Journal of Paleontology, September 1, 2002; 76(5): 928 - 930.





JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Paleontological Society