Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
Paleobiology Email Content Delivery
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Paleobiology; June 2001; v. 27; no. 2; p. 405-423; DOI: 10.1666/0094-8373(2001)027<0405:THSOOA>2.0.CO;2
© 2001 Paleontological Society
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (12)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by McShea, D. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

The hierarchical structure of organisms: a scale and documentation of a trend in the maximum

Daniel W. McShea1

1 Daniel W. McShea. Department of Biology, Duke University, Box 90338, Durham, North Carolina 27708-0338. dmcshea{at}duke.edu

The degree of hierarchical structure of organisms—the number of levels of nesting of lower-level entities within higher-level individuals—has apparently increased a number of times in the history of life, notably in the origin of the eukaryotic cell from an association of prokaryotic cells, of multicellular organisms from clones of eukaryotic cells, and of integrated colonies from aggregates of multicellular individuals. Arranged in order of first occurrence, these three transitions suggest a trend, in particular a trend in the maximum, or an increase in the degree of hierarchical structure present in the hierarchically deepest organism on Earth. However, no rigorous documentation of such a trend—based on operational and consistent criteria for hierarchical levels—has been attempted. Also, the trajectory of increase has not been examined in any detail. One limitation is that no hierarchy scale has been developed with sufficient resolution to document more than these three major increases. Here, a higher-resolution scale is proposed in which hierarchical structure is decomposed into levels and sublevels, with levels reflecting number of layers of nestedness, and sublevels reflecting degree of individuation at the highest level. The scale is then used, together with the body-fossil record, to plot the trajectory of the maximum. Two alternative interpretations of the record are considered, and both reveal a long-term trend extending from the Archean through the early Phanerozoic. In one, the pattern of increase was incremental, with almost all sublevels arising precisely in order. The data also raise the possibility that waiting times for transitions between sublevels may have decreased with increasing hierarchical level (and with time). These last two findings—incremental increase in level and decreasing waiting times—are tentative, pending a study of possible biases in the fossil record.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Biol. Bull.Home page
R. C. Neves, K. J. K. Sorensen, R. M. Kristensen, and A. Wanninger
Cycliophoran Dwarf Males Break the Rule: High Complexity with Low Cell Numbers
Biol. Bull., August 1, 2009; 217(1): 2 - 5.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
J. L. Payne, A. G. Boyer, J. H. Brown, S. Finnegan, M. Kowalewski, R. A. Krause Jr., S. K. Lyons, C. R. McClain, D. W. McShea, P. M. Novack-Gottshall, et al.
Two-phase increase in the maximum size of life over 3.5 billion years reflects biological innovation and environmental opportunity
PNAS, January 6, 2009; 106(1): 24 - 27.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
A. E. Vinogradov and O. V. Anatskaya
Organismal complexity, cell differentiation and gene expression: human over mouse
Nucleic Acids Res., October 8, 2007; 35(19): 6350 - 6356.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PaleobiologyHome page
J. D. Marcot and D. W. McShea
Increasing hierarchical complexity throughout the history of life: phylogenetic tests of trend mechanisms
Paleobiology, March 1, 2007; 33(2): 182 - 200.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Integr. Comp. Biol.Home page
E. J. Stellwag
Are Genome Evolution, Organism Complexity and Species Diversity Linked?
Integr. Comp. Biol., November 1, 2004; 44(5): 358 - 365.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Integr. Comp. Biol.Home page
D. W. McShea and M. A. Changizi
Three Puzzles in Hierarchical Evolution
Integr. Comp. Biol., February 1, 2003; 43(1): 74 - 81.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Integr. Comp. Biol.Home page
S. J. Hageman
Complexity Generated by Iteration of Hierarchical Modules in Bryozoa
Integr. Comp. Biol., February 1, 2003; 43(1): 87 - 98.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PaleobiologyHome page
Testing for bias in the evolution of coloniality: a demonstration in cyclostome bryozoans
Paleobiology, September 1, 2002; 28(3): 308 - 327.





JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Paleontological Society