|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
| JOURNAL HOME | HELP | CONTACT PUBLISHER | SUBSCRIBE | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
1 Daniel W. McShea. Department of Biology, Duke University, Box 90338, Durham, North Carolina 27708-0338. dmcshea{at}duke.edu
The degree of hierarchical structure of organismsthe number of levels of nesting of lower-level entities within higher-level individualshas apparently increased a number of times in the history of life, notably in the origin of the eukaryotic cell from an association of prokaryotic cells, of multicellular organisms from clones of eukaryotic cells, and of integrated colonies from aggregates of multicellular individuals. Arranged in order of first occurrence, these three transitions suggest a trend, in particular a trend in the maximum, or an increase in the degree of hierarchical structure present in the hierarchically deepest organism on Earth. However, no rigorous documentation of such a trendbased on operational and consistent criteria for hierarchical levelshas been attempted. Also, the trajectory of increase has not been examined in any detail. One limitation is that no hierarchy scale has been developed with sufficient resolution to document more than these three major increases. Here, a higher-resolution scale is proposed in which hierarchical structure is decomposed into levels and sublevels, with levels reflecting number of layers of nestedness, and sublevels reflecting degree of individuation at the highest level. The scale is then used, together with the body-fossil record, to plot the trajectory of the maximum. Two alternative interpretations of the record are considered, and both reveal a long-term trend extending from the Archean through the early Phanerozoic. In one, the pattern of increase was incremental, with almost all sublevels arising precisely in order. The data also raise the possibility that waiting times for transitions between sublevels may have decreased with increasing hierarchical level (and with time). These last two findingsincremental increase in level and decreasing waiting timesare tentative, pending a study of possible biases in the fossil record.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
R. C. Neves, K. J. K. Sorensen, R. M. Kristensen, and A. Wanninger Cycliophoran Dwarf Males Break the Rule: High Complexity with Low Cell Numbers Biol. Bull., August 1, 2009; 217(1): 2 - 5. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. L. Payne, A. G. Boyer, J. H. Brown, S. Finnegan, M. Kowalewski, R. A. Krause Jr., S. K. Lyons, C. R. McClain, D. W. McShea, P. M. Novack-Gottshall, et al. Two-phase increase in the maximum size of life over 3.5 billion years reflects biological innovation and environmental opportunity PNAS, January 6, 2009; 106(1): 24 - 27. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. E. Vinogradov and O. V. Anatskaya Organismal complexity, cell differentiation and gene expression: human over mouse Nucleic Acids Res., October 8, 2007; 35(19): 6350 - 6356. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. D. Marcot and D. W. McShea Increasing hierarchical complexity throughout the history of life: phylogenetic tests of trend mechanisms Paleobiology, March 1, 2007; 33(2): 182 - 200. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. J. Stellwag Are Genome Evolution, Organism Complexity and Species Diversity Linked? Integr. Comp. Biol., November 1, 2004; 44(5): 358 - 365. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. W. McShea and M. A. Changizi Three Puzzles in Hierarchical Evolution Integr. Comp. Biol., February 1, 2003; 43(1): 74 - 81. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. J. Hageman Complexity Generated by Iteration of Hierarchical Modules in Bryozoa Integr. Comp. Biol., February 1, 2003; 43(1): 87 - 98. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Testing for bias in the evolution of coloniality: a demonstration in cyclostome bryozoans Paleobiology, September 1, 2002; 28(3): 308 - 327. |
||||
| JOURNAL HOME | HELP | CONTACT PUBLISHER | SUBSCRIBE | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |