|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
| JOURNAL HOME | HELP | CONTACT PUBLISHER | SUBSCRIBE | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
1 Norman MacLeod. Department of Palaeontology, The Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London, SW7 5BD, United Kingdom. N.MacLeod{at}nhm.ac.uk
Phylogenies provide a rich source of information that should be exploited in designing quantitative hypothesis tests in paleobiological contexts. Viewing such data analysis problems through the prism of phylogenetically structured comparisons can help add realism and depth to paleobiological data-analysis strategies. Two examples of the importance of adopting a phylogenetic perspective are discussed. In the first example, a phylogenetic-comparative approach is used to test correlations between ecological, morphological, and biological characteristics of planktonic foraminifera. Results suggest that the presence of spines and photosynthetic symbionts in NeogeneRecent species are not adaptations to living in shallow-intermediate planktonic depth habitats. In the second, a phylogenetic-comparative approach is used to reveal the presence of morphological correlations with locomotor function in a mammalian carnivore data set. Paleontologists can play an active role in improving comparative data analyses by (1) helping to develop improved phylogenies, especially those that provide better estimates of branch lengths, and (2) helping to resolve a number of outstanding issues surround the question of ancestral character-state specification.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
K. D. Angielczyk and M. L. Walsh Patterns in the Evolution of Nares Size and Secondary Palate Length in Anomodont Therapsids (Synapsida): Implications for Hypoxia as a Cause of End-Permian Tetrapod Extinctions Journal of Paleontology, May 1, 2008; 82(3): 528 - 542. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| JOURNAL HOME | HELP | CONTACT PUBLISHER | SUBSCRIBE | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |