Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
Paleobiology Don't get GSW? Talk to your librarian.
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Paleobiology; December 2000; v. 26; no. 4; p. 556-577; DOI: 10.1666/0094-8373(2000)026<0556:ATMAOC>2.0.CO;2
© 2000 Paleontological Society
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (10)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by McGhee, G. R.
Right arrow Articles by McKinney, F. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

A theoretical morphologic analysis of convergently evolved erect helical colony form in the Bryozoa

George R. McGhee, Jr1 and Frank K. McKinney2

1 George R. McGhee Jr. Department of Geological Sciences, Wright-Rieman Laboratories, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey 08903.
2 Frank K. McKinney. Department of Geology, Appalachian State University, Boone, North Carolina 28608.

Exploration of the theoretical morphospace of erect helical colony form in Bryozoa, created by McKinney and Raup (1982), reveals that only a small volume of the three-dimensional space of hypothetical form is occupied by actual colonies of the Paleozoic fenestrates (Class Stenolaemata) Archimedes and Helicopora, helical species of the cheilostome (Class Gymnolaemata) Bugula, and the cyclostome (Class Stenolaemata) Crisidmonea archimediformis. Actual helical-colony bryozoans are not found in regions of the morphospace characterized by colony geometries that possess the largest surface areas of filtration sheet. Examination of computer-simulated colonies in the theoretical morphospace reveals that, although possessing high surface areas, colonies in the empty region of high-surface-area morphospace possess other aspects of geometry that are unrealistic as filter-feeding geometries: the filtration-sheet whorls are held at small acute angles to the central colony axis and are deeply nested within one another, both of which are disadvantageous conditions for the system of filter feeding used by the extant cheilostome Bugula, and presumably by extinct helical-colony bryozoans as well.

Even though actual bryozoans are found only in the low to intermediate surface-area regions of the theoretical morphospace, surface area of filtration sheet is a major determinant of form in these helical colonies, as is evidenced by a negative correlation in values of the parameters BWANG and ELEV exhibited by the colony data. Minimum values of BWANG are even further constrained by the apparent need of the Archimedes colonies to maintain filtration-sheet branching densities within the range of 20 to 50.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of PaleontologyHome page
FENESTRATE GRAPTOLITE THEORETICAL MORPHOLOGY: GEOMETRIC CONSTRAINTS ON LOPHOPHORE SHAPE AND ARRANGEMENT IN EXTINCT HEMICHORDATES
Journal of Paleontology, March 1, 2003; 77(2): 360 - 367.



Home page
Integr. Comp. Biol.Home page
S. J. Hageman
Complexity Generated by Iteration of Hierarchical Modules in Bryozoa
Integr. Comp. Biol., February 1, 2003; 43(1): 87 - 98.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Paleontological Society