Quick
Search: 		  
advanced search
 GSW Home   GeoRef Home   My GSW Alerts   Contact GSW   About GSW   Journals List   Help 
Paleobiology Signup for GSW Email News
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Paleobiology; September 2000; v. 26; no. 3; p. 513-519; DOI: 10.1666/0094-8373(2000)026<0513:TGPTTE>2.0.CO;2
© 2000 Paleontological Society
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (11)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Valentine, J. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Two genomic paths to the evolution of complexity in bodyplans

James W. Valentine1

1 James W. Valentine. Museum of Paleontology and Department of Integrative Biology, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720. jwv{at}ucmp1.berkeley.edu

Morphologically complex metazoans appear abruptly during the Cambrian explosion. Suggested measures of metazoan complexity include number of cell morphotypes and aspects of the genome such as the amount of DNA, the number of genes, and the information content of the genome or egg. Estimates of gene numbers are now available for metazoan species belonging to five different phyla or subphyla. There is little correlation between gene number and morphological complexity in the invertebrates: relatively complex forms can have fewer genes than relatively simple forms. Presumably, the more complex forms use more gene-expression events during development, implying that, on average, cis-regulatory elements of more complex invertebrates are richer in binding sites than are those of simpler forms. Vertebrates have many more genes than invertebrates and therefore have more total gene-expression events during development, although they may have, on average, fewer expression events per gene than the invertebrates. There are thus two genomic pathways in the evolution of metazoan complexity: one involves increasing the number of genes, the other involves increasing the number of cis-regulatory binding sites. Both modes were associated with the origin of bodyplans that first appear as fossils during the Cambrian explosion.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
A. M. Heimberg, L. F. Sempere, V. N. Moy, P. C. J. Donoghue, and K. J. Peterson
MicroRNAs and the advent of vertebrate morphological complexity
PNAS, February 26, 2008; 105(8): 2946 - 2950.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Integr. Comp. Biol.Home page
D. W. McShea and M. A. Changizi
Three Puzzles in Hierarchical Evolution
Integr. Comp. Biol., February 1, 2003; 43(1): 74 - 81.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Integr. Comp. Biol.Home page
J. W. Valentine
Architectures of Biological Complexity
Integr. Comp. Biol., February 1, 2003; 43(1): 99 - 103.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
M. Medina, A. G. Collins, J. D. Silberman, and M. L. Sogin
Evaluating hypotheses of basal animal phylogeny using complete sequences of large and small subunit rRNA
PNAS, August 14, 2001; 98(17): 9707 - 9712.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Paleontological Society