Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
Paleobiology Don't get GSW? Talk to your librarian.
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Paleobiology; September 2000; v. 26; no. 3; p. 450-465; DOI: 10.1666/0094-8373(2000)026<0450:FPINDI>2.0.CO;2
© 2000 Paleontological Society
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (12)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Paul, G. S.
Right arrow Articles by Christiansen, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Forelimb posture in neoceratopsian dinosaurs: implications for gait and locomotion

Gregory S. Paul1 and Per Christiansen2

1 Gregory S. Paul. 3109 North Calvert Station, Side Apartment, Baltimore, Maryland 21218. GSP1954{at}aol.com
2 Per Christiansen. Department of Vertebrates, Zoological Museum, Universitetsparken 15, 2100 Copenhagen Ø, Denmark. p2christiansen{at}zmuc.ku.dk

Ceratopsid dinosaurs traditionally have been restored with sprawling forelimbs and were considered unable to run at high speeds. An alternative view restores the ceratopsids as rhinoceros-like with parasagittal forelimb kinematics and the ability to run faster than extant elephants. Several anatomical difficulties concerning the mounting of ceratopsid skeletons with nearly parasagittal forelimbs stem not from the forelimb itself, but from errors in rib and vertebral articulation. Matching a skeletal restoration to a probable ceratopsid trackway shows that the hands were placed directly beneath the glenoids, and that manual impressions were directed laterally, not medially as in sprawling reptiles. Pedal impressions in trackways are medial to the manual impressions, owing to the slightly averted elbow and to the asymmetrical distal femoral condyles, which directed the crus slightly medially. The limbs of ceratopsians of all sizes display substantial joint flexure, strongly indicating that the elephantine forelimb posture that has sometimes been suggested as the alternative to a sprawling posture is erroneous. The articular surfaces of uncrushed ceratopsian scapulocoracoids and forelimb joints confirm that the forelimb operated in a near-parasagittal plane with the elbows only slightly averted. The maximal running speed of even the largest ceratopsids is inferred to have significantly exceeded that of elephants and was probably broadly similar to that of rhinos.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
G. Paul
The nearly columnar limbs of elephants are very different from the more flexed, spring action limbs of running mammals and birds
J. Exp. Biol., January 1, 2009; 212(1): 152 - 153.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
J. R. Hutchinson
Response: Of ideas, dichotomies, methods, and data - how much do elephant kinematics differ from those of other large animals?
J. Exp. Biol., January 1, 2009; 212(1): 153 - 154.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
L. Ren, M. Butler, C. Miller, H. Paxton, D. Schwerda, M. S. Fischer, and J. R. Hutchinson
The movements of limb segments and joints during locomotion in African and Asian elephants
J. Exp. Biol., September 1, 2008; 211(17): 2735 - 2751.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Paleontological Society